Home > INBLF Articles and Media > INBLF Articles > Intellectual Property (Page 2)
In United States v. Arthrex, the Supreme Court Delivers A Seemingly Simple Solution That May Prove More Complicated in Practice
Rothwell Fig logo 1 | International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms

Author: Dylan HaversackPublished: June 23, 2021This week, in United States v. Arthrex, Inc., the Supreme Court vacated and remanded a decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“the CAFC”), holding that the administrative patent judges (“APJs”) at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) are unconstitutionally appointed. While

Read More
Arthrex, APJ, appellate decisions
Proper Representation of Prophetic Examples
Rothwell Fig logo 1 | International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms

Author: Patrick MoonPublished: July 29, 2021Earlier this month, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a notice in the Federal Register providing guidance regarding the proper presentation of prophetic examples and working examples in a patent application. According to the guidance, the proper presentation of prophetic and working examples

Read More
PTAB, USPTO, MPEP
AI and Posthumous Digital Personas Lutzker, Susan J.
Slutzker profile image | International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms

Author: Susan J. LutzkerPublished: July 15th, 2021Our IP system may be ill-equipped to address emerging issues as tech companies work to create digital versions of individuals, and the ethical issues are profound. Kazuo Ishiguro’s newest work of fiction is startlingly on point.Click here to view entire blog article at Lutzker &

Read More
digitalpersona, AI, Ishiguro
United States v. Arthrex: Supreme Court Crafts a Creative Remedy for the Appointment of Patent Judges Carmadella, Jeannette Maurer
JCarmadella profile image | International Network of Boutique and Independent Law Firms

Author: Jeannette Maurer CarmadellaPublished: July 9th, 2021Holding that the current appointment process for administrative patent judges is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court in United States v. Arthrex fashioned a creative remedy by leaving the process intact but giving the director of the USPTO the power and discretion to review and overturn

Read More
Arthrex, USPTO, Lutzker & Lutzker LLP